1995 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.4 i.e. (90 Hp) 1995Overall Score46.25/100
1995 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 2000 Ford Puma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationFord Puma
Alfa RomeoMakeFord
146ModelPuma
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors3
Performance
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationFord Puma
12,8 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
179 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1351 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
115 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationFord Puma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption9,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationFord Puma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationFord Puma
4257 mmLength3984 mm
1712 mmWidth1674 mm
1425 mmHeight1345 mm
1175 KgWeight1035 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Alfa Romeo 146 and 2000 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…