DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
GalantModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
215 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
163 HPPower177 HP
223 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4433 mm
1740 mmWidth1809 mm
1445 mmHeight1709 mm
1340 KgWeight1550 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Galant and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…