DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi A6 vs 2012 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
AudiMakeKTM
A6ModelX-Bow
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors—

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
8,0 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
209 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
211 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank40 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
MultitronicGears6
225/60 R16Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4915 mmLength3738 mm
1874 mmWidth1915 mm
1468 mmHeight1202 mm
1670 KgWeight790 Kg
2912 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi A6 and 2012 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…