DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRover
GalantModel25
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
133 HPPower113 HP
181 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3990 mm
—Width1688 mm
—Height1419 mm
—Weight1130 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Galant and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…