DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Galant vs 1996 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
GalantModelDiscovery
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
200 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower134 HP
178 NmTorque312 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank89 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption14,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4680 mmLength4524 mm
1740 mmWidth1810 mm
1445 mmHeight1960 mm
1310 KgWeight2020 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Galant and 1996 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…