DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Audi A6 vs 2010 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationMazda 3
AudiMakeMazda
A6Model3
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationMazda 3
10,3 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
208 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationMazda 3
4927 mmLength4580 mm
1855 mmWidth1755 mm
1459 mmHeight1470 mm
1550 KgWeight1390 Kg
2843 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Audi A6 and 2010 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…