DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi FTO vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 166

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAlfa Romeo
FTOModel166
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed243 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2959 cc
225 HPPower226 HP
275 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption18,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size215/55 R16W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4590 mmLength4720 mm
1840 mmWidth1815 mm
1285 mmHeight1416 mm
1670 KgWeight1510 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi FTO and 2000 Alfa Romeo 166 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 166 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…