DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs 1996 Dodge Stratus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi FTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeDodge
FTOModelStratus
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
170 HPPower133 HP
186 NmTorque175 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
16,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15 HTyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4725 mm
1735 mmWidth1822 mm
1300 mmHeight1320 mm
1150 KgWeight1355 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2743 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi FTO and 1996 Dodge Stratus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…