DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi FTO vs 1998 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi FTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
FTOModelGolf
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
126 HPPower115 HP
161 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
17,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/70 R14 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4149 mm
1735 mmWidth1735 mm
1300 mmHeight1439 mm
1100 KgWeight1237 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi FTO and 1998 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…