DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi FTO vs 1996 Dodge Neon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi FTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeDodge
FTOModelNeon
1996Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
126 HPPower132 HP
161 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
17,8 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 STyre size165/80R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4364 mm
1735 mmWidth1708 mm
1300 mmHeight1391 mm
1100 KgWeight1061 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2642 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi FTO and 1996 Dodge Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…