DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi FTO vs 1994 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
FTOModelPassat
1994Model year1994
CoupeBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors—

Performance

200 km/hTop speed260 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1800 cc
126 HPPower125 HP
161 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
17,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
185/70 R14 STyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength—
1735 mmWidth—
1300 mmHeight—
1100 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi FTO and 1994 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…