DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs 2005 Holden Monaro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Endeavor

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
EndeavorModelMonaro
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
218 HPPower233 HP
339 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
P235/65 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4830 mmLength4790 mm
1870 mmWidth1840 mm
1768 mmHeight1400 mm
1920 KgWeight1600 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor and 2005 Holden Monaro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Endeavor leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…