DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mitsubishi EK Wagon vs 2004 Kia Picanto Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi EK Wagon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

55.5–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeKia
EK WagonModelPicanto
2005Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h16,3 s
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement999 cc
50 HPPower60 HP
62 NmTorque863 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank35 lt
5,75 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
155/65 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3495 mm
1475 mmWidth1595 mm
1550 mmHeight1480 mm
790 KgWeight981 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mitsubishi EK Wagon and 2004 Kia Picanto approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi EK Wagon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…