DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2002 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Eclipse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
EclipseModelRange Rover
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
225 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
208 HPPower177 HP
278 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank100 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/50 R17Tyre size255/55 R19
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4455 mmLength4950 mm
1750 mmWidth1955 mm
1310 mmHeight1860 mm
1480 KgWeight2500 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Eclipse and 2002 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Eclipse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…