DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Eclipse

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
EclipseModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2378 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
162 HPPower177 HP
217 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
—Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4433 mm
—Width1809 mm
—Height1709 mm
—Weight1550 Kg
—Wheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Eclipse leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…