DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2004 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
EclipseModelX-Trail
2004Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSUV
2+2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
149 HPPower165 HP
214 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4455 mmLength4455 mm
1750 mmWidth1765 mm
1310 mmHeight1675 mm
1320 KgWeight1470 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse and 2004 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…