DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A6 vs 2016 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
AudiMakeKTM
A6ModelX-Bow
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors—

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
7,9 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
224 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
190 HPPower240 HP
400 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
DieselFuel typePetrol
73 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7 S tronicGears6
225/60 R 16Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4943 mmLength3738 mm
1874 mmWidth1915 mm
1461 mmHeight1202 mm
1810 KgWeight790 Kg
2912 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A6 and 2016 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…