DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mitsubishi Delica vs 1995 Ford Tempo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tempo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
DelicaModelTempo
1995Model year1995
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2476 ccEngine displacement2307 cc
105 HPPower102 HP
240 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank54 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4595 mmLength4490 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1950 mmHeight1340 mm
1710 KgWeight1275 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mitsubishi Delica and 1995 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…