DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mitsubishi Delica vs 1995 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Delica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
DelicaModel960
1995Model year1995
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,7 s
165 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2350 ccEngine displacement2473 cc
145 HPPower170 HP
206 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,0 ltUrban consumption—
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/80 R14Tyre size195/65 R15 V
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4725 mmLength4871 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1960 mmHeight1411 mm
1660 KgWeight1600 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mitsubishi Delica and 1995 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Delica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…