2009 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 2.0 TDI (136 Hp) 2009Overall Score72.75/100
2009 Audi A6 vs 2013 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Chevrolet
Captiva
Chevrolet Captiva 2.2 VCDi 16V (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Audi A6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4.25 points.
72.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
AudiMakeChevrolet
A6ModelCaptiva
2009Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
204 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
136 HPPower163 HP
320 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
MultitronicGears6
205/60 R16Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A6SpecificationChevrolet Captiva
4927 mmLength4673 mm
1855 mmWidth1868-1849 mm
1459 mmHeight1756 mm
1575 KgWeight1778 Kg
2843 mmWheelbase2707 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Audi A6 and 2013 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…