DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Delica vs 2004 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
DelicaModelMondeo
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1789 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
135 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4285 mmLength4731 mm
1635 mmWidth1812 mm
1850 mmHeight1429 mm
1320 KgWeight1492 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Delica and 2004 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…