DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
ColtModelLancer
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
108 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70R13Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

3900 mmLength4275 mm
1680 mmWidth1690 mm
1365 mmHeight1385 mm
945 KgWeight940 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Colt and 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…