DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1996 Toyota Corolla Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
ColtModelCorolla
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
113 HPPower110 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R13; 175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4365 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1365 mmHeight1315 mm
959 KgWeight—
2440 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Colt and 1996 Toyota Corolla approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…