1996 • Mitsubishi
Colt
Mitsubishi Colt 1.6 GLXi 16V (CA4A) 1996Overall Score56.25/100
1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1996 Mazda Protege Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.6 i (115Hp) 1996Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Colt
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi ColtSpecificationMazda Protege
MitsubishiMakeMazda
ColtModelProtege
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Mitsubishi ColtSpecificationMazda Protege
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
113 HPPower115 HP
153 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi ColtSpecificationMazda Protege
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi ColtSpecificationMazda Protege
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/70 R13Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mitsubishi ColtSpecificationMazda Protege
3955 mmLength4335 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1365 mmHeight1420 mm
959 KgWeight—
2440 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Mitsubishi Colt and 1996 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…