DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1996 Daihatsu Pyzar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeDaihatsu
ColtModelPyzar
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
113 HPPower115 HP
153 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4050 mm
1690 mmWidth1640 mm
1365 mmHeight1620 mm
959 KgWeight1080 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2395 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Colt and 1996 Daihatsu Pyzar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…