DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1996 Citroen Evasion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
ColtModelEvasion
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
185 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
137 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3880 mmLength4454 mm
1680 mmWidth1812 mm
1365 mmHeight1710 mm
1050 KgWeight1575 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Colt and 1996 Citroen Evasion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…