DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A6 vs 1996 Toyota Corona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Corona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
A6ModelCorona
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
168 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R16Tyre size175/70 R14 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4797 mmLength4600 mm
1783 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1410 mm
1355 KgWeight1150 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A6 and 1996 Toyota Corona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Corona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…