1996 • Audi
A6
Audi A6 2.0 (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score58.25/100
1996 Audi A6 vs 1996 Suzuki Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Suzuki
Vitara
Suzuki Vitara 2.0 i 16V (3 dr) 1996Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Suzuki Vitara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A6SpecificationSuzuki Vitara
AudiMakeSuzuki
A6ModelVitara
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats—
4Doors3
Performance
Audi A6SpecificationSuzuki Vitara
11,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
115 HPPower132 HP
168 NmTorque166 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A6SpecificationSuzuki Vitara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,0 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi A6SpecificationSuzuki Vitara
4797 mmLength—
1783 mmWidth—
1430 mmHeight—
1355 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Audi A6 and 1996 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…