DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A6 vs 1996 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Protege

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
A6ModelProtege
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
115 HPPower135 HP
168 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4797 mmLength4035 mm
1783 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1170 mm
1355 KgWeight1323 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A6 and 1996 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…