DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A6 vs 1996 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
AudiMakeFord
A6ModelMondeo
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
11,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
115 HPPower130 HP
168 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationFord Mondeo
4797 mmLength4556 mm
1783 mmWidth1751 mm
1430 mmHeight1427 mm
1355 KgWeight1328 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A6 and 1996 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…