DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs 2005 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
ColtModelAD
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
210 NmTorque132 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/50 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3810 mmLength4370 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1520 mmHeight1475 mm
1045 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mitsubishi Colt and 2005 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…