DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi Colt vs 2006 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
ColtModelC3
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h16,1 s
180 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1332 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
95 HPPower69 HP
125 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3870 mmLength3934 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1550 mmHeight1563 mm
970 KgWeight1185 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi Colt and 2006 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…