DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Colt vs 2003 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
ColtModelC3
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
170 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
82 HPPower68 HP
120 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3880 mmLength3850 mm
1680 mmWidth1667 mm
1365 mmHeight1529 mm
945 KgWeight1022 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Colt and 2003 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…