DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1999 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
ColtModelFuncargo
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
170 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
82 HPPower86 HP
120 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3880 mmLength3890 mm
1680 mmWidth1690 mm
1365 mmHeight1680 mm
945 KgWeight1055 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Colt and 1999 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…