DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1999 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFiat
ColtModelBravo
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
170 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
82 HPPower82 HP
120 NmTorque113 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14

Dimensions

3880 mmLength4025 mm
1680 mmWidth1755 mm
1365 mmHeight1420 mm
945 KgWeight985 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Colt and 1999 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…