DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi Colt vs 2012 Fiat Qubo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFiat
ColtModelQubo
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h15,2 s
180 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1332 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
95 HPPower75 HP
125 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3870 mmLength3959 mm
1695 mmWidth1716 mm
1550 mmHeight1735 mm
970 KgWeight1275 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi Colt and 2012 Fiat Qubo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…