DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi Chariot vs 1994 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Chariot

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
ChariotModelClio
1994Model year1994
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
4Doors2/3

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
180 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
135 HPPower150 HP
176 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank43 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5+1
185/70 R14 HTyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4515 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1595 mmHeight—
1400 KgWeight1010 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi Chariot and 1994 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Chariot leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…