DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Chrysler Intrepid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChrysler
ChallengerModelIntrepid
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
245 HPPower245 HP
343 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank64 lt
17 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
265/70 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4530 mmLength5174 mm
1775 mmWidth1900 mm
1730 mmHeight1420 mm
1950 KgWeight1616 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Chrysler Intrepid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…