DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
ChallengerModelC5
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
170 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
185 HPPower207 HP
265 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank66 lt
16 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
265/70 R15Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4618 mm
1775 mmWidth1770 mm
1730 mmHeight1476 mm
1830 KgWeight1480 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…