DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 1995 Lexus GS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLexus
ChallengerModelGS
1996Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,8 s
170 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
185 HPPower212 HP
265 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank80 lt
16 ltUrban consumption17,5 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
—Average consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
265/70 R15Tyre size225/55 R16 94V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4965 mm
1775 mmWidth1795 mm
1730 mmHeight1425 mm
1830 KgWeight1720 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Challenger and 1995 Lexus GS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…