DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 1996 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
ChallengerModelMPV
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors4

Performance

155 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2835 ccEngine displacement2954 cc
140 HPPower154 HP
314 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank74 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4465 mm
1775 mmWidth1826 mm
1730 mmHeight1694 mm
1850 KgWeight1831 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Challenger and 1996 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…