DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
CarismaModelMegane
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
200 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
122 HPPower102 HP
174 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4164 mm
1710 mmWidth1698 mm
1405 mmHeight1420 mm
1215 KgWeight1140 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…