DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2002 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSaturn
CarismaModelSL
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
122 HPPower126 HP
174 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4524 mm
1710 mmWidth1687 mm
1405 mmHeight1397 mm
1215 KgWeight1088 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2002 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…