DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSeat
CarismaModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
215 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
167 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
9 ltUrban consumption14 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4617 mm
1710 mmWidth1810 mm
1405 mmHeight1728 mm
1175 KgWeight1754 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…