DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 1995 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeBMW
CarismaModelZ3
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
215 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
140 HPPower115 HP
167 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
9 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4025 mm
1710 mmWidth1692 mm
1405 mmHeight1288 mm
1175 KgWeight1160 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1995 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…