DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 1996 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escort

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
CarismaModelEscort
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
116 HPPower115 HP
162 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4445 mmLength4293 mm
1710 mmWidth1700 mm
1405 mmHeight1394 mm
1130 KgWeight1115 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1996 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escort leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…