DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2002 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
CarismaModelXsara
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
190 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
103 HPPower101 HP
141 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank54 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4167 mm
1710 mmWidth1698 mm
1405 mmHeight1405 mm
1185 KgWeight1070 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2002 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…