DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Chevrolet Corsa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChevrolet
CarismaModelCorsa
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
103 HPPower92 HP
141 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength3730 mm
1710 mmWidth1610 mm
1405 mmHeight1390 mm
1185 KgWeight975 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2445 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Chevrolet Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…