DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 1999 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeCitroen
CarismaModelSaxo
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
185 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
99 HPPower98 HP
137 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength3737 mm
1710 mmWidth1620 mm
1405 mmHeight1360 mm
1105 KgWeight920 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1999 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…