DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Subaru Impreza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Impreza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSubaru
CarismaModelImpreza
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
180 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
137 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4350 mm
1710 mmWidth1690 mm
1405 mmHeight1415 mm
1080 KgWeight1115 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Subaru Impreza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Impreza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…